2004 Audi A6 vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1965 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1965 MG MGC.
Because 1965 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1965 MG MGC | |
Make | Audi | MG |
Model | A6 | MGC |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |