2004 Audi A6 vs. 1966 Holden EH

To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 477 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.

Compare all specifications: