2004 Audi A6 vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 274 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Audi | DAF |
Model | A6 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 26 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 33 L |