2004 Audi A6 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 68 kg more than 2004 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |