2004 Audi A6 vs. 1968 Mini MK II
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mini MK II would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1968 Mini MK II. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 842 kg more than 1968 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mini MK II. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mini MK II.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1968 Mini MK II | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A6 | MK II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2040 mm |