2004 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Dodge Dart
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Dart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Dart would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Dart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Dart (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Dart should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6.
Because 1969 Dodge Dart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Dart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Dart (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Dart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1969 Dodge Dart | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A6 | Dart |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 5210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |