2004 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (355 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6.
Because 1969 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Ford Thunderbird (300 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 1969 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A6 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 355 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 29.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 91 L |
