2004 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1969 Ford Zephyr. (81 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1969 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Ford Zephyr. (153 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1969 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 153 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 72.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 41 L |