2004 Audi A6 vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (401 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A6 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 248 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 502 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2850 mm |