2004 Audi A6 vs. 1973 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1973 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 654 kg more than 1973 Datsun 240Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1973 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1973 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A6 | 240Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11 L/100km |