2004 Audi A6 vs. 1973 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1973 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1973 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 800 kg more than 1973 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1973 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 2101.

Compare all specifications: