2004 Audi A6 vs. 1975 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 418 kg more than 1975 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1975 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | A6 | 280Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |