2004 Audi A6 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Audi | Seat |
Model | A6 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2460 mm |