2004 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 495 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Audi | Daihatsu |
Model | A6 | Taft |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 2764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2030 mm |