2004 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 757 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (112 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6 | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2390 mm |