2004 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | A6 | 9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Top Speed | 221 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |