2004 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Subaru Rex
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1982 Subaru Rex. (31 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Subaru Rex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1982 Subaru Rex. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Subaru Rex. (44 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1982 Subaru Rex | |
Make | Audi | Subaru |
Model | A6 | Rex |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 44 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2260 mm |