2004 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Zastava 132

To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 297 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: