2004 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Volvo 240

To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.

Compare all specifications: