2004 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A6 | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2160 mm |