2004 Audi A6 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | A6 | 1700 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1692 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 221 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 36 L |