2004 Audi A6 vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 857 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (96 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | A6 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 96 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2420 mm |