2004 Audi A6 vs. 1989 Matra-Simca M25
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Matra-Simca M25 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Matra-Simca M25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Matra-Simca M25 (363 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 1989 Matra-Simca M25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1989 Matra-Simca M25 | |
Make | Audi | Matra-Simca |
Model | A6 | M25 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 363 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |