2004 Audi A6 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 457 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | Apollo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |