2004 Audi A6 vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 756 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | Midge |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |