2004 Audi A6 vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 839 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | Midge |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 340 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |