2004 Audi A6 vs. 2000 BMW Z9
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (221 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 119 kg more than 2000 BMW Z9.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (450 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW Z9. (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW Z9.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2000 BMW Z9 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | A6 | Z9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1686 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2960 mm |