2004 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 712 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2002 Daewoo Lanos | |
Make | Audi | Daewoo |
Model | A6 | Lanos |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1348 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 115 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.4 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |