2004 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2004 Audi A6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota Pod. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota Pod would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2002 Toyota Pod. (194 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota Pod. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 782 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | A6 | Pod |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 194 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |
