2004 Audi A6 vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (370 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.4 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |