2004 Audi A6 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 359 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (450 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A6 | Condor |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1805 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |