2004 Audi A6 vs. 2009 BMW M3

To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6.

Because 2009 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (300 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 BMW M3. (295 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 BMW M3.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Audi A6 2009 BMW M3
Make Audi BMW
Model A6 M3
Year Released 2004 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2983 cc 3999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 5 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 220 HP 414 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 8300 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 295 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 12.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2770 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.4 L/100km 11.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 17 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 14.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 63 L