2004 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 194 kg more than 2004 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac SRX. (302 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac SRX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | SRX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6950 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 302 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |