2004 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (300 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2004 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 57 L |