2004 Audi A6 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 206 kg more than 2004 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (300 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | A6 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |
