2004 Audi A6 vs. 2010 SSC Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 815 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 429 kg more than 2010 SSC Aero.
Because 2010 SSC Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SSC Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SSC Aero (1,357 Nm) has 1007 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (350 Nm). This means 2010 SSC Aero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2010 SSC Aero | |
Make | Audi | SSC |
Model | A6 | Aero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 1062 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 1357 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1722 kg | 1293 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1090 mm |