2004 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,179 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Audi A6. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2012 Acura TL.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (401 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Audi | Acura |
Model | A6 | TL |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4179 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 401 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |