2004 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado

To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi A6 (168 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.

Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (230 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6. 2012 Holden Colorado has automatic transmission and 2004 Audi A6 has manual transmission. 2004 Audi A6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Colorado will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: