2004 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 200 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi A6 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi A6 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Audi | Mini |
| Model | A6 | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 4.8 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |
