2004 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi A6 weights approximately 407 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mini |
Model | A6 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 279 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3758 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1391 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.2 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |