2004 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A6 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1008 kg more than 2004 Audi A6.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A6. (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi A6 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
Model | A6 | Phantom |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 720 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 6092 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3820 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.2 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |