2004 Audi Allroad vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi Allroad weights approximately 1469 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi Allroad | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | Allroad | 25 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 456 kg |