2004 Audi Allroad vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi Allroad weights approximately 1265 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi Allroad | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Audi | DAF |
| Model | Allroad | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 33 L |
