2004 Audi Allroad vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (300 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1975 Datsun 260Z. (163 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 1975 Datsun 260Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi Allroad weights approximately 744 kg more than 1975 Datsun 260Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi Allroad (380 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Audi Allroad will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi Allroad | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
Make | Audi | Datsun |
Model | Allroad | 260Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1944 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2581 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |