2004 Audi Allroad vs. 1982 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Audi Allroad.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi Allroad | 1982 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | Brougham |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3090 mm |