2004 Audi Allroad vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (250 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi Allroad (350 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Audi Allroad will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi Allroad | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Allroad | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2210 mm |
