2004 Audi Allroad vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 4,163 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (300 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi Allroad weights approximately 599 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi Allroad (380 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Audi Allroad will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi Allroad | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | Allroad | CU-X |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1944 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |
