2004 Audi Allroad vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Audi Allroad is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi Allroad (250 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi Allroad (350 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Audi Allroad will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Audi Allroad | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | Allroad | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2380 mm |
