2004 Audi Allroad vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi Allroad. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi Allroad would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Audi Allroad is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi Allroad weights approximately 479 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi Allroad (351 Nm) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Audi Allroad will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi Allroad | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | Allroad | Condor |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 351 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |