2004 Audi Allroad vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi Allroad. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi Allroad would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2004 Audi Allroad. (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi Allroad.
Because 2004 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Audi Allroad | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | Allroad | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |